Economy and environment: the electoral programs of political parties for elections emmys 2011 date

"Do not vote" and "active abstention": citizens who want to express their dissent against the current policy the Administration responds crisply and clearly. The protest could be completely useless.
After the note of the Interior Ministry widespread in January [1], now seem no longer looming doubts about the meaning to be attributed emmys 2011 date to the behavior emmys 2011 date of those who, in protest, refusing intend to abstain from voting the ballot.
As explained in a previous article (read: Elections: active abstention, that's what happens with the "no vote"), the singular protest is to show up at the polling station, to register and, only then, refuse to pick up the tab, asking to put on the record the reasons for the protest ("Reject the board in protest and wonder that is verbalized." Beyond that, the voter - or rather, emmys 2011 date the non-voter - could add more personal reasons, such as, for example, "none of the politicians included in the lists represents me ").
Even the prefectures are organized in recognizing the orientation of the Ministry of the Interior, by issuing to the mayors of the municipalities the instructions for the voting to give the elections office section.
In the notes make clear that the so-called "non-voting with refusal of the card" has never been disciplined by any standard; Law [2], in fact, provides the only case in which the voter, after registering and having picked up the card, he returned without even going into the cabin. In this case, the rule is that the voter should be counted emmys 2011 date among the voters emmys 2011 date and the board considered void.
Unlike speech must instead be in case the voter, even after registering, waste ballot. As we said, this hypothesis is not covered under any standard. However, to interpret the legislative gap is now attended by the Ministry and the individual prefectures. emmys 2011 date
The hypothesis of the refusal of the card is considered completely identical to that in which the voter to vote only ask for some - not all - consultations to vote (for example, of voting for regional and not for policies ).
Well, in these cases, the President of the polling station may (but not "must", says the Ministry) take on record the protest voter and his refusal to receive the card, provided that the minutes be done in a concise and fast, with the notation in the minutes of the general voter, the reason for the complaint or protest, "enclosing any writings that the voter considers to deliver to the polling station." From this passage, emmys 2011 date we understand emmys 2011 date that - also in order not to obstruct the regularity and the early holding of the vote - the voters will be able to write home the reason for the protest, to be delivered to the polling station and then does attach to the minutes.
With regard to the detection of the number of voters, however, came the mournful notes. In fact, it is now clear that those who refuse the card will never be counted among the voters of the polling station.
Therefore, it will be as if the protesters had never left home. Moreover, most likely, the reasons for their protest remain unknown to those who, instead, will win the election and that, now intent on toast, think certainly in anything but to investigate the reasons of those who did not want to vote for him ...
All rights reserved

Economy and environment: the electoral programs of political parties for elections emmys 2011 date 2013 Elections: active abstention, that's what happens with the "no vote" elections: the electoral programs of political parties at work Elections: electoral programs of parties on cuts to politics Elections and Politics: I pee, Dad
Thank you for publishing this clarification and I would note. The reports are public documents and election is up to the parliament to evaluate protests and complaints emmys 2011 date verbalized. If parliament will think of something else, you will want to do so because, not because it is not their duty to take note of the reports. That said it is obvious that, as with any protest, its effectiveness depends on achieving a "critical mass", but that is legitimate and legal fortunately there is no longer any doubt.
The decision emmys 2011 date not to consider abstaining active reveals how undemocratic it is actually our country. A democratic country would consider also the opinion of its citizens who do not feel represented by the candidates, without forcing them to vote in blocked nose for the "least worst". You should calculate the active abstention as a vote in effect that, in the case of the majority, the election invalid and will force the political parties to submit new and new lists in a second election issued a few months of Distan